top of page
Search

Why "Evolutionary Architecture"-Based Systems will dominate the Loan Management space

Updated: Jan 24




All legacy lending softwares at the banks, NBFCs and FinTechs will be replaced in next 15 years with "Evolutionary Architecture" based systems.


This is a strong statement. Why do you say so?

Lets understand the problem first


Its difficult to incorporate changes with changing landscape


  • Changes are continuously required in LMS due to evolving loan products, need for automation and regulatory compliances

  • Current model of incorporating changes is through lenders writing a BRD document for the change and paying for the change request

  • The above model works okay for first 5 years but then the problem of legacy tech starts hitting

  • Problem of legacy tech

    • Systems age in terms of their underlying tech stack. Its starts getting difficult to maintain legacy systems

      • There are several changes specific to the customer built on top of the product, hence upgrading the product gets difficult

      • Developers change on the project

      • The tech-stack starts getting older. Even compiling the code successfully gets difficult.

      • New developers don't like to work on the old-stack. 

      • Software providers slow down on changes due the legacy tech.

    • Changes become too risky - they have risk of breaking the existing flow too

      • Manually testing of the application for thousands of test scenarios gets difficult for every change made

      • and ensuring nothing breaks in production is a difficult promise

    • Changes become too costly

      • For every small change the amount of testing and deployment diligence required and hence the costs

Limited evolution due to limited ability to think

  • In the current landscape - all the thinking job has to be done by the customer themselves

  • Product is as good as your ability to think - Each customer is differently positioned in terms of their in-house product's teams ability to think

    • Those who don't think don't get any improvements

    • Those who think a bit get little bit improvements

    • Those who think a lot get more improvements

Upgrades are largely absent OR they take really long if offered

  • Most of the software vendors don't provide product upgrades other than the paid change requests

  • If they do then its a long 3 to 12 month long project with enough stability risks

    • All their customers are on different versions

    • Product upgrades mostly require complete data migration - posing risks of stability

    • Product upgrades require long testing and fixing cycles similar to new product installations

  • With direct + indirect costs - upgrades turn out to be costly

Bulky avoidable IT costs: leading to lack of competitive advantage

  • Total Cost of Ownership is on an average 2X to 3X the application license cost

    • (a) Direct cost of licensing of the application +

    • (b) Cost of licenses of underlying software packages used - for e.g. database license, server license, licensing for tools etc.

    • (c) Costs of Infra

      • In the current model, software providers are not incentivised to optimize the infra

      • There is usually an over-budgeting of infra to the tune of 2X to 3X of the required infra

    • (d) Cost of team to support the infra, security and change management

      • An LMS on an average would have 5 to 10 folks on customers payroll just to manage the show

    • (e) Direct cost of changes and maintenance charged by the vendor

Unclear responsibilities leading poor service levels

  • If system slows down, whose responsibility is this?

    • Software vendor would blame it on the infra team and request for infra increase

    • Bank would blame the software vendor to optimize the performance

  • If something breaks in production then whose responsibility is this?

    • Software vendor would expect UAT sign-off from the customer for each change

    • Customers would have to put in their own testing mechanisms to provide sign-offs

    • If anything goes wrong in production, it would be responsibility of the customer

  • If there is a Security breach, whose responsibility is this?

    • Software vendor would expect banks to highlight the security observations

    • They would fix the observations identified by the banks

    • There is no incentive to the software provider to proactively improve security management



How does "Evolutionary Architecture" solve the problems?

Defy the ageing in software world

  • Living softwares - Continuous improvements every month

  • Always a clear roadmap for product evolution

    • Thinking hat is worn by the vendor

    • filtering and prioritising the crowd-sourced the ideas

  • Product simply evolves on its own with much efforts of customers

  • Tech stack upgrades are regularly undertaken by the vendor

Upgrades are seamless with way lower risks

  • Softwares on Evolutionary Architecture put strong focus on testing automation

    • Thousands of test cases automatically figure out if anything is breaking due to code changes

  • Upgrades don't need customers time and efforts - monthly upgrades are seamless

Lower costs

  • Usually "Evolutionary" softwares offer an all-inclusive pricing and hence their is a clear incentive for the vendor to optimise on underlying costs

  • They prefer using matured open-source databases and servers to save big time on the third party license costs

  • They continuously optimize on infra costs to improve their margins

  • They build infra automation to minimise the people costs

Better security

  • "Evolutionary Architecture" softwares offer softwares as a service - hence the responsibility is much larger for the vendors

  • Vendors in this architecture foresee security breach as a major reputation risk. Hence they invest in better security

  • They constantly rollout improvement in security

  • Time-to-act for any new identified vulnerability is way much faster due to its underlying evolutionary nature

Better performance

  • Due to complete ownership of infra management, evolutionary softwares witness some of the highest loads

  • To combat the possible slowness they optimize on their code and infra to offer high performant experience

Better scalability

  • Evolutionary softwares are built on micro-services model offering close to unlimited scaling

Lower hassles

  • Its far far hassle free for the customers with evolutionary softwares taking up significant responsibilities on their own i.e.

    • Change management

    • Infra management

    • Security management

    • Performance management


Ok understood "Evolutionary Architecture" is better, but is it strong enough to make the switch?


Kunal Shah had proposed a Delta 4 theory to predict permanent change in customer behaviour. Reference video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4px19xzK7zI


Kunal Shah's Delta 4 theory posits that a startup's product or service must be four times better or more efficient than existing solutions to bring about a significant and lasting change in consumer behaviour.


Evolutionary architectures are able to generate a delta 4 difference for the below reasons

  • Great product for current needs

    • This holds true for Synoriq LMS - its feature richness makes it a great product today

  • Future proof - Ensures future improvements so future is in safe hands

  • Lesser hassles - outsourced the major hassles - Security, Performance, Infra, Improvements, Compliances

  • Lower costs - effective costs including direct+indirect costs is at least 50% lower


About Synoriq's Evolutionary LMS


At Synoriq, we believe the future of lending isn't static, it's alive. That's why we built our 𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗟𝗼𝗮𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 (LMS) on a dynamic core, constantly adapting and improving to keep you ahead of the curve.


Think of it as your lending co-pilot, not just a clunky software.


Here's why leading NBFCs and FinTechs choose Synoriq:

👉 𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗔𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲: Our LMS isn't just a platform, it's a living entity. It constantly learns and adapts, ensuring your operations are always future-proof.


👉 𝗙𝗲𝗮𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲: We don't do feature fatigue. Synoriq's comprehensive suite caters to every lending need, from term loans to credit lines, colending, subvention, and beyond.


👉 𝗦𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗟𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘀: Dream big, lend big. Synoriq's robust infrastructure handles any loan volume with ease, so you can focus on growth, not limitations.


👉 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀: Navigate the ever-changing regulatory landscape with confidence. Synoriq's LMS stays laser-focused on compliance, giving you peace of mind.


👉 Great user 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲: Forget clunky interfaces and frustrated borrowers. Synoriq champions user-friendliness and mobile-first design, making lending a breeze for everyone.


👉 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝗺𝗽𝗵𝗼𝗻𝘆: Don't go it alone. Our team of 150+ experts is your lending success partner. From implementation to optimisation, we're here to guide you every step of the way.



The results speak for themselves:

✅ 𝟯𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬𝗖𝗿+ AUM serviced: Empowering leading lenders across the spectrum.

✅ 𝟯𝟱+ 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀: Trusted by the best in the business.

✅ 𝟭𝟱𝟬+ 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘁𝘀: A force of expertise at your fingertips.



At Synoriq, we're not just building a loan management system, we're building a better lending landscape.


Ready to join the lending revolution?



The future of lending tech is bright, and it's powered by Synoriq.

233 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page